Testing

A-One and I have finally completed his practice and baseline tests using CogStateTM.  For him to have had sufficient sleep it usually means he's free in the afternoons, but I'm not always free then.  In my attempts to co-ordinate our schedules I'd occasionally hear faint mumblings of ... 'not important' ... but, in the end, he submitted relatively graciously.

To administer the tests I was required to read the instructions while they were also presented to him on the screen.  For the practice tests, he usually read ahead and pressed on without waiting for me to finish the instructions.  Except the working memory tests - he read and re-read them before proceeding.

For the baseline tests, because they are timed and should be done without significant breaks, I asked him if he needed a glass of water or to use the toilet before we started.  He decided he did.

An hour later (sigh) we got started.

Again I read the preparatory instructions, reminding him that the tests were the same as the practice tests, just different in the specifics so that they are still 'fresh'.

Mum: Are you ready to start?

A-One: Not yet.  I'll let you know.

A minute or so passed.

Mum: Are you ready yet?

A-One: No.  I'll let you know when I am.

A minute or so passed.

Mum: How about now?

A-One: No. Not yet.

Mum: Are you composing yourself, getting your mind ready for this?

A-One: Yes.

The first baseline test was to remember a shopping list.  As I started to read out the items, he burst out, 'Aren't these meant to be the same words as before?'  So we used up some seconds as I explained that the test is the same, but the words are different.  That's what the 'composing' time had been about - trying to remember the words from the practice test!

For most of the tests again, he pressed on without waiting for me to finish reading the instructions, except for the more challenging of the working memory tests.  We completed all the tests in about an hour and fifteen minutes. My observation, supported by the test results, showed that his working memory is quite good. When tests required that he 'work out' a rule or find a path in a maze, he performed better than when he had to remember many things short term.  But for anything that had made it into his memory, his delayed recall was then good.  This is consistent with our experience of him - it might take a while for something to get into his brain, but once it's there, it's there forever!  So it sounds to me like he would benefit from practising learning things off by heart - not so much to know many more things, but to practice the learning technique required to remember things.

Mum: Do you want to see your test results?

A-One: Nah.

Pondering the good working memory results, and recalling that his previous neuro-psyche tests indicated a weak working memory, I asked him if he was willing to do a little exercise that would take only a minute (a working memory test).

Mum: I'll give you five numbers and I want you to repeat them back to me - backwards.

A-One: OK.

Mum: 7    3     9     5     8

A-One gazed down with a look of concentration on his face.  After about 15 seconds he looked at me and giggled.  He looked down again for about another 10 seconds.  Looked up, giggling again.

Then, tumbling the numbers out in quick succession:

A-One: 85937!

CogniFit

I've just had a good look at CogniFit.  And it's fun. I saw it referenced in a Friends of SharpBrains LinkedIn discussion.

It's also in SharpBrains list of vendors to watch in 2013/14 and is based on peer reviewed research, although mainly for aging adults. It includes some very interesting features:

• You can register for free and get some free 'neurons' which is like a currency
• You can do an assessment first up to get your profile of cognitive strengths and weaknesses as well as how you compare with others in your age range
• Cognitive abilities are described at quite a granular level e.g. not just Memory, but working memory, short-term memory, contextual memory
• You can earn more 'neurons' by training and 'unlock' new games by spending your neurons, or you can purchase more neurons (with real money) to play more
• You can bet your neurons to win more
• You can challenge other players
• The training is tailored based on your assessment
• It's fun

I hadn't investigated this site in depth before because it's pitched to keeping your mind agile as you age, but I think it would be really good for A-One - especially if we can get some other players for him to play with.  It seems to have incorporated the appeal of online multiplayer games e.g. like WOW and the chance of notching up your 'neurons' to play more.

I'm pretty excited about it as it seems to include a number of features that I've been looking for in relation to A-One, in particular the assessments which can be done at any time, the increased granularity of cognitive abilities including planning, the ability to choose specific games for these, and the ability to play with and challenge others.

I've done several training sessions today and have not had to pay any real money. 

(I started using my mouse left-handed several years ago, mainly to ease some tension that had been developing on the right side of my neck from a highly stressful job.  But for these games today I quickly switched to my right hand because the speed challenge sucked me right in!)

Now the hard part is gaining A-One's willingness to try it.

Working Memory

I can hardly believe it's been over a month since I blogged about my son A-One's brain training. He has continued doing some, but it hasn't been daily, more like every 4 or 5 days.  His overall score has moved up 5 percentiles during that time:

• His Speed is now 72nd percentile, with over half of the games having included information processing
• He cracked 50th percentile for Memory, although only a couple included working memory exercises
• He moved up 5 percentiles in Attention, but slipped back a couple of percentiles over the last few games played
• He has moved up almost 12 percentiles in Flexibility
• Problem Solving stays doggedly around 8-9th percentile, although he has been served up very few problem solving games over the last month

Once A-One had cracked the 50th percentile for Memory, I wanted to include additional working memory games e.g. Dual NBack download because it is a well-known clinically proven peer reviewed exercise for working memory, and is also free.  Roughly speaking, working memory is where you do (manipulate) things in your head e.g. reciting a known telephone number backwards.  A-One has an impairment in this area, and it's a pretty key one for learning.

I chose the downloadable version (there is an online version at Dual NBack online) so that any lack of access to internet would not be an issue.  Although he also does a version of that game in his Lumosity training, he doesn't get working memory games every time he plays, and I'd like to intensify his training in this area.  Cogmed is also a commercially available peer reviewed program for working memory which I had originally thought I'd book him in for, but I wanted to gauge his commitment level before committing funds.

The downloadable version does not have as simple look and feel as the online version, however it is more configurable, and can be set to start more simply than the online version.  Basically, the player has to remember two things (dual) and hit nominated keys when there have been matches from N times ago.  To get him started, I initially set it up for A-One to remember only the previous try (1 Back) instead of the default which is two tries ago (2 Back).  I tried it myself first so that I could explain how to play (for me, the explanation with the game took a few reads through).  He downloaded it happily enough (around 20 March), clearly indicating that he didn't need my help downloading it.

However, when it came to playing it:

A-One: This game is too hard - you have to remember two things.

Mum: Yes, it's difficult at first, but once you get used to it, you'll get the hang of it.

A-One: I'm not doing it.

And he hasn't since ...